Ethics and Accountability on the U.S. Supreme Court: An Analysis of Recusal Practices. Albany, NY: Suny Press (December 2017)
This original research monograph provides a comprehensive examination of the causes and consequences of recusal behavior on the U.S. Supreme Court. I explore the conditions under which recusals occur, as well as the impact of recusals on case outcomes, the scope of majority opinions, the likelihood of certiorari grants, and public attitudes about the Court. I trace the evolution of media commentary about recusals, showing how popular discourse about recusals has become politicized and is inflaming demands for reform. I also provide readers with a rich historical overview of the Court’s recusal practices and describe and evaluate proposals for reforming the process. My key finding is that the justices do not strictly follow the recusal guidelines set by Congress, but neither do they ignore these guidelines. Instead, the justices are strategic in their compliance with ethical rules, balancing Congressional guidelines against other institutional and policy goals. You can read the first chapter here.
3 comments:
Hey I am for the first time here. I came across this blog and I find It really useful & it helped me out much. I hope to give something back and aid others like you helped me. I think this is engaging and eye-opening material. Thank you so much for caring about your content and your readers.
Visit : shadow fight 3 mod apk
The motivation has been improved for the exact use of the norms and all possible items for the individuals
Visit : asphalt 8 mod apk
bandar ceme terpercaya
Situs poker terbaik
Situs poker terpercaya
Situs poker online
Post a Comment